Is Medical Ultrasound Imaging Safe?

June 8, 2006
Many concerns have been raised in the medical community about ultrasound's safety to human beings under observation, particularly when used in prenatal care. Ultrasound waves are energy (heat) waves, and as a result, they potentially can be h

Many concerns have been raised in the medical community about ultrasound's safety to human beings under observation, particularly when used in prenatal care. Ultrasound waves are energy (heat) waves, and as a result, they potentially can be harmful to human tissues and organs if the heat levels used are high or sustained for long periods of time.

Tissues absorb heat, which increases the temperature locally. Cavitation, or the formation of bubbles when dissolved gases come out of a solution due to local ultrasound heating, is another concern. The larger concern is with the use of CW ultrasound waves, which have higher energy levels over a specific period of time than pulsed sonography.

Heat is only one way ultrasound can potentially affect human tissue negatively. Ultrasound itself does not produce audible noise. But secondary vibrations can produce audible noises as loud as 100 dB, causing fetuses to move. Other still poorly understood effects include shearing forces within tissues, induced flows within fluids, and the creation of minute amounts of toxic chemicals.

One trend is clear. Since the mid-1990s, ultrasound energy dosage levels have been rising (but still within federal guidelines) as the medical profession increases its use of sonography. Medical professionals believe the benefits of ultrasound far outweigh any perceived or potential risks.

However, there have been no known documented ill effects associated with ultrasound in either humans or animals. Granted, some medical providers are understandably concerned that expectant mothers may have their fetuses exposed to too much ultrasound imaging. But the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has established safety levels for ultrasound imaging power levels and frequencies when used for prenatal applications.

About the Author

Roger Allan

Roger Allan is an electronics journalism veteran, and served as Electronic Design's Executive Editor for 15 of those years. He has covered just about every technology beat from semiconductors, components, packaging and power devices, to communications, test and measurement, automotive electronics, robotics, medical electronics, military electronics, robotics, and industrial electronics. His specialties include MEMS and nanoelectronics technologies. He is a contributor to the McGraw Hill Annual Encyclopedia of Science and Technology. He is also a Life Senior Member of the IEEE and holds a BSEE from New York University's School of Engineering and Science. Roger has worked for major electronics magazines besides Electronic Design, including the IEEE Spectrum, Electronics, EDN, Electronic Products, and the British New Scientist. He also has working experience in the electronics industry as a design engineer in filters, power supplies and control systems.

After his retirement from Electronic Design Magazine, He has been extensively contributing articles for Penton’s Electronic Design, Power Electronics Technology, Energy Efficiency and Technology (EE&T) and Microwaves RF Magazine, covering all of the aforementioned electronics segments as well as energy efficiency, harvesting and related technologies. He has also contributed articles to other electronics technology magazines worldwide.

He is a “jack of all trades and a master in leading-edge technologies” like MEMS, nanolectronics, autonomous vehicles, artificial intelligence, military electronics, biometrics, implantable medical devices, and energy harvesting and related technologies.

Sponsored Recommendations

Comments

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of Electronic Design, create an account today!