Magma Delivers SSTA Methodology For UMC Processes

June 4, 2007
A statistical static-timing analysis (SSTA) methodology is now available from Magma Design Automation for UMC’s 90- and 65-nm processes. Based on Magma's Quartz SSTA tool, the methodology addresses timing and yield problems caused by process

A statistical static-timing analysis (SSTA) methodology is now available from Magma Design Automation for UMC’s 90- and 65-nm processes. Based on Magma's Quartz SSTA tool, the methodology addresses timing and yield problems caused by process variation in 65-nm and below technologies. The methodology, which includes statistical library support, extraction for interconnect variation, and statistical analysis, has passed UMC's qualification process.

Traditional static-timing analysis (STA) approaches don’t scale to the 65-nm node. STA, which relies on brute-force corner and highly guard-banded on-chip variation (OCV) analysis, and derives timing based on pessimistic and worst-case gate and interconnect models, can be overly conservative and inaccurate. It’s also unable to account for process and metal variations, causing designers to sign off on designs that may ultimately fail in silicon. This unreliable approach results in lower performance and longer, more costly design cycles.

Quartz SSTA supplements traditional sign-off methods with powerful and accurate statistical static-timing analysis. It uses random variables rather than fixed delays and produces a statistical distribution, rather than best-case and worst-case models.

This approach can account for global (inter-die) and random (intra-cell) process variations, composite-current-source (CCS) models, statistical leakage analysis, and statistical optimization, automatically identifying clocks, paths, cells, and metal layers that are sensitive to variation. Utilizing the unified data model architecture, Quartz SSTA then works with Magma's IC implementation system to automatically fix timing problems that result from variation. With this process-variability-aware IC implementation flow, pessimism is eliminated, predictability is enhanced, and timing closure and sign-off can be achieved faster and easier.

Magma Design Automation
www.magma-da.com/FoundryPartners.html#UMC

UMC
www.umc.com/English/design/r.asp

About the Author

David Maliniak | MWRF Executive Editor

In his long career in the B2B electronics-industry media, David Maliniak has held editorial roles as both generalist and specialist. As Components Editor and, later, as Editor in Chief of EE Product News, David gained breadth of experience in covering the industry at large. In serving as EDA/Test and Measurement Technology Editor at Electronic Design, he developed deep insight into those complex areas of technology. Most recently, David worked in technical marketing communications at Teledyne LeCroy. David earned a B.A. in journalism at New York University.

Sponsored Recommendations

Comments

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of Electronic Design, create an account today!