Nanopower VFC Includes Self-Compensating Charge Pump

June 22, 1998
Of the many starting points for voltage-to-frequency converter (VFC) designs, one of the golden oldies is the classic diode-capacitor charge pump. An example of this fundamental circuit is represented by D1, D2, C1, and C2 (...

Of the many starting points for voltage-to-frequency converter (VFC) designs, one of the golden oldies is the classic diode-capacitor charge pump. An example of this fundamental circuit is represented by D1, D2, C1, and C2 (see the figure). Analysis of this simple topology reveals that each cycle of A1’ s 4-V p-p squarewave output will inject a charge onto C5 given by:

Q− = −(C1 + C2 + Cs)\[V(C1 + C2)/(C1 + C2 + Cs) − 2 Vd\]

where:

V = the peak-to-peak pump-drive voltage generated by A1.

Cs = stray capacitance at the Dn/Cn common node including diode junction capacitance.

Vd = diode forward voltage drop.

An obvious snag with this scheme is that the need to cope with temperature dependence of Vd (approximately −2 mV/°C) inevitably complicates VFCs that use this basic pump. Elegant compensation circuits exist that work by tweaking V so as to cancel out Vd (pioneered by Bob Pease; and for an interesting twist by Jim Williams, see Linear Technology’s LT1495 data sheet) through relationships like: V = VREF + 2 Vd. But these methods sometimes run into trouble, particularly in micropower applications where the need to make Q dinky (thereby minimizing current consumption) runs afoul of Cs >> 0.

The figure illustrates a different Vd fix. In this circuit, D3, D4, C3, and C4 work together to make a compensatory charge pulse for each A1 output cycle:

Q+ = (C3 + C4 + Cs)\[(V * C3/(C3 + C4 + Cs) − 2 Vd\]

The payoff is that, if we assume C1 = C4 and C2 = C3, and equality of Vds and Css, then each full cycle of A1 will inject onto C5 a net charge pulse of:

(Q+) + (Q−) = (C1 + C2 + Cs)\{V\[C2 − (C1 + C2)\]/(C1 + C2 + Cs) + 2 Vd − 2 Vd\} = V\[C2 − (C1 + C2)\] = −V * C1

Not only do we get compensation for the bothersome Vds, but the effects of stray capacitance also get rubbed out.

The rest of the figure uses the new self-compensating pump to close a feedback loop around A1 so that input currents are balanced by: If = −Fo *V * C1 = 0 to − 1 µA as Vin goes from 0 to +2.5 V and Fo goes from 0 to 10 kHz. A2 serves to develop a stable drive source V from the LTC1440 1.2-V internal reference and will do so for supply voltages from 4.5 to 36 V. A3 is a startup circuit that restores oscillation of the A1 chargepump, ac-coupled feedback loop if lockup occurs from, say, input overrange.

Overall temperature coefficient of the converter depends on matching of all pump capacitances, including circuit board layout contribution to Cs parasitics. Just ±5% tolerance is good enough to reduce the charge-pump temperature coefficient to approximately 50 ppm/°C. Converter linearity is ±0.03% and current draw is an unexcelled 6.5 to 9 µA (@V+ = 5 V) as Fo goes from 0 to 10 kHz.

Sponsored Recommendations

The Importance of PCB Design in Consumer Products

April 25, 2024
Explore the importance of PCB design and how Fusion 360 can help your team react to evolving consumer demands.

PCB Design Mastery for Assembly & Fabrication

April 25, 2024
This guide explores PCB circuit board design, focusing on both Design For Assembly (DFA) and Design For Fabrication (DFab) perspectives.

What is Design Rule Checking in PCBs?

April 25, 2024
Explore the importance of Design Rule Checking (DRC) in manufacturing and how Autodesk Fusion 360 enhances the process.

Unlocking the Power of IoT Integration for Elevated PCB Designs

April 25, 2024
What does it take to add IoT into your product? What advantages does IoT have in PCB related projects? Read to find answers to your IoT design questions.

Comments

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of Electronic Design, create an account today!