Electrical Engineer Scanrail Dreamstime L 1536 X864 Flat

Informed Analysis Picks Better 555 Timer To Drive Power MOSFET

Dec. 4, 2013
The venerable 555-type timer makes an effective driver for power MOSFETs, but you have to understand the drive situation when selecting the correct variation of the basic timer. This idea shows how the wrong choice led to unreliable operation and failure, and the basic analysis that points to the correct choice.

This article is part of the Ideas for Design Series: Vol. 3, No. 1

The original bipolar 555 timer, the NE555, is excellent for driving a power MOSFET’s gate. Newer CMOS versions such as the 7555, LMC555, and TLC555 use less power, but they have trouble sourcing enough current to drive a gate well and can even be damaged by load mismatch.

Download this article in .PDF format
This file type includes high resolution graphics and schematics when applicable.

The figure shows part of a pulse-width-modulated dimmer for a 12-V incandescent lamp. It originally used a CMOS TLC555, which kept failing with an open output pin as the failure mode. In addition, the MOSFET (an IRF 4905) ran hot. Pin 3 of the 555 was connected directly to the MOSFET gate.

Examination with an oscilloscope showed that the gate voltage had a rise and fall time of about 2 µs and that the pulse-width modulation (PWM) switching frequency was about 100 kHz, so about 40% of each cycle was spent on the rise and fall. That explained why the MOSFET was running hot. Much of the time, it was neither fully on nor fully off, but in the lossy intermediate-state switching-transition mode.

The input capacitance of the IRF 4905 is typically 3500 pF. Using the well-known current-charging equation I = C dV/dt, we find that the gate charging and discharging current with a 12-V square wave is about 21 mA, twice the rated output of the CMOS 555. That explains the failures.

The solution was simple. The timer chip was changed to a bipolar NE555 (rated for 200-mA sink and source current), an 82-Ω resistor was added to guarantee that the current would always be below 150 mA, and the switching frequency was reduced to 3 kHz to reduce the proportion of time spent “on the slope.” The resulting circuit performed more reliably, and the MOSFET did not even get warm.

Michael Covington, PhD, operates a consulting practice, Covington Innovations (www.covingtoninnovations.com), in Athens, Ga.

Read more articles from the Ideas for Design Series: Vol. 3, No. 1

Sponsored Recommendations

TTI Transportation Resource Center

April 8, 2024
From sensors to vehicle electrification, from design to production, on-board and off-board a TTI Transportation Specialist will help you keep moving into the future. TTI has been...

Cornell Dubilier: Push EV Charging to Higher Productivity and Lower Recharge Times

April 8, 2024
Optimized for high efficiency power inverter/converter level 3 EV charging systems, CDE capacitors offer high capacitance values, low inductance (< 5 nH), high ripple current ...

TTI Hybrid & Electric Vehicles Line Card

April 8, 2024
Components for Infrastructure, Connectivity and On-board Systems TTI stocks the premier electrical components that hybrid and electric vehicle manufacturers and suppliers need...

Bourns: Automotive-Grade Components for the Rough Road Ahead

April 8, 2024
The electronics needed for transportation today is getting increasingly more demanding and sophisticated, requiring not only high quality components but those that interface well...


To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of Electronic Design, create an account today!