What’s the Difference Between Continuous-Time and Discrete-Time Sigma-Delta ADCs? (Download)

Log in to download the PDF of this article that breaks down CT and DT sigma-delta ADC architectures and compares their advantages and disadvantages.

Read this article online.

Sigma-delta analog-to-digital converters (ADCs) can effortlessly achieve an effective number of bits (ENOB) of 24 bits or higher, making them exceptionally suitable for the precision measurement of micro-signals. These converters are widely utilized in applications such as electronic scales, pressure gauges, industrial temperature sensors (e.g., resistance temperature detectors/thermocouples), high-fidelity audio recording and playback, and physiological signal monitoring (e.g., ECG, EEG).

Compared to successive-approximation-register (SAR) or pipeline ADCs, traditional sigma-delta ADCs trade speed for precision by necessitating oversampling and averaging, which limits the output data rates. However, the advent of continuous-time (CT) sigma-delta ADCs has enabled output rates to escalate from hundreds of samples per second to the mega-sample range, significantly broadening their application scope. This article digs into the architecture of CT sigma-delta ADCs and provides a comparative analysis with discrete-time (DT) variants.

Sign up for our eNewsletters
Get the latest news and updates

Voice Your Opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of Electronic Design, create an account today!