Getting EDA Back On Track With Platform Innovation

Jan. 11, 2007
The innovation model in the EDA industry needs to shift. In the pc-board era, inventions like routing, placement, and logic synthesis greatly improved productivity. When applied to increasingly more complex ICs, implementation of tools became extremely im

The innovation model in the EDA industry needs to shift. In the pc-board era, inventions like routing, placement, and logic synthesis greatly improved productivity. When applied to increasingly more complex ICs, implementation of tools became extremely important: Innovation came from new data structures and efficient algorithms. When predictability disappeared from the design flow due to submicron effects, a simple linear design flow stopped working and very complex integrated tools were created to iteratively solve design problems.

Today, this has resulted in an environment that’s not conducive to innovation. Startups are spending most of their capital recreating infrastructure. Universities are shut out of the innovation process. And, large CAD vendors put most of their capital resources into integration efforts. To keep up with technology, we need the efficiencies associated with “platform innovation”1 to put the EDA innovation ecosystem back into gear.

We need to convert these complex integrated tools into platforms by exposing “the platform layer within” for use by platform partners. The platform partner can then focus on truly differentiating innovation, instead of wasting effort to recreate “me-too” infrastructure. As an added benefit, the partner will be able to access markets that otherwise would be difficult to reach.

To implement a platform approach, we need to define standards as APIs and not ASCII formats. This will have two profound effects. First, it will allow tools to talk to each other, instead of spitting out data that another tool can barely read. Second, it will move a significant part of the problems that designers face in defining a design flow to the CAD tool developer. The designers will be forced to take on these challenges when integrating the code.

Since the cost of building working methodologies from EDA tools is estimated at two to three times the cost of the tool itself, this spending can flow into the EDA industry, fueling growth. Design-for-manufacturing (DFM) startups can focus on effectively changing shapes instead of rebuilding shapes engines. Maybe system-level design can become a reality by defining the correct APIs into the design implementation flow.

When the industry’s leading researchers, designers, and tool developers convene for June’s 44th Design Automation Conference in San Diego, a special management tutorial will focus on the innovation process throughout our industry.

References:
1. Geoffrey A. Moore, Dealing with Darwin, 2005

Sponsored Recommendations

TTI Transportation Resource Center

April 8, 2024
From sensors to vehicle electrification, from design to production, on-board and off-board a TTI Transportation Specialist will help you keep moving into the future. TTI has been...

Cornell Dubilier: Push EV Charging to Higher Productivity and Lower Recharge Times

April 8, 2024
Optimized for high efficiency power inverter/converter level 3 EV charging systems, CDE capacitors offer high capacitance values, low inductance (< 5 nH), high ripple current ...

TTI Hybrid & Electric Vehicles Line Card

April 8, 2024
Components for Infrastructure, Connectivity and On-board Systems TTI stocks the premier electrical components that hybrid and electric vehicle manufacturers and suppliers need...

Bourns: Automotive-Grade Components for the Rough Road Ahead

April 8, 2024
The electronics needed for transportation today is getting increasingly more demanding and sophisticated, requiring not only high quality components but those that interface well...

Comments

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of Electronic Design, create an account today!