Latest from Test & Measurement

Dreamstime_photosampler_59880277
dreamstime_photosampler_59880277
Dreamstime_cunayah-jouna_362253229
dreamstime_cunayahjouna_362253229
ID 44446702 © Feverpitched | Dreamstime.com
dronecamera_dreamstime_l_44446702
ID 213740052 © Alexandr Hlopotov | Dreamstime.com
cooling_dreamstime_l_213740052
Krwphotographic, Dreamstime.com
Circuit Board Krwphotographic Dreamstime Promo 60494247dddca

Optical Sensors: Apply Reliability Strategies to Drive Smart Component Selection (.PDF Download)

March 10, 2021

Read this article online.

For designers of engineered electronics powering our most critical applications and devices, reliability is a common goal. At the same time, a design engineer or purchasing manager must have the ability to quantify reliability of the parts selected—a delicate balance between performance and dependability—to optimize total cost of ownership. On this landscape, a greater understanding of mean time between failure (MTBF) considerations can improve both reliability and costs.

Purchasing professionals at such organizations are all too familiar with budgets and the steps required for correlated selection and sourcing. Still, they may have limited insight into how to evaluate reliability reports, how to ensure statistically similar comparison among sources and options, and how these factors may affect their product design and development. Will a commercial-off-the-shelf (COTS) part suffice, or is S-Level (space-rated) required? Are all parts designated for a particular level the same amongst suppliers? And is MTBF data inherently reported in similar fashion from study to study and vendor to vendor?

Comments

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of Electronic Design, create an account today!