Latest from Embedded

ID 76795646 © Cybrain | Dreamstime.com
promo__id_76795646__cybrain__dreamstime
214182021 © Pavlineo | Dreamstime.com
promo__pavlineo_dreamstime_xxl_214182021
ID_316508515_alena_butusava, and Macronix
promo__id_316508515__alena_butusava__dreamstime
ID 348425309 © Yuriy Nedopekin | Dreamstime.com
datacenter_dreamstime_l_348425309
William Wong, 2025 © Endeavor Business Media
Do you recognize these charts
ID 22585047 © Agsandrew | Dreamstime.com
id_22585047__agsandrew__dreamstime_new
ID 361819724 © Anastasiia Torianyk | Dreamstime.com
chip_dreamstime_l_361819724
ID 107552055 © Scanrail | Dreamstime.com
car_headlight_dreamstime_l_107552055
AdaCore and Dreamstime_152088993
65a0233f5645e6001e1d04b9 0and1s Dreamstime Security 152088993

Putting Protocols into Practice with RecordFlux (Download)

Jan. 11, 2024

Read this article online.

Translating a message specification from paper to code can be complicated and prone to error. In the best-case scenario, all aspects of the message specification are implemented in program code, housed in structures, with potentially thousands of lines of defensive coding and/or exception handling to catch potential errors. Each received message could become complex if conditions, case statements or subprograms may be required to verify message validity.

Not only is this process cumbersome for the application developer, it also makes maintaining the application difficult to nearly impossible. And testing and debugging... even worse! Tracing through thousands of lines of code and conditions is a time-consuming process. Any errors that slip through could expose the entire application to severe security issues as well (think cyber exploits).

Comments

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of Electronic Design, create an account today!